# `ridge_pls` — Ridge-augmented PLS _Group_: **Regularised** · _Registry tolerance_: `0.1` ## Description Ridge-augmented PLS From the `pls4all.sklearn.RidgePLSRegression` docstring: > L2-augmented PLS regression. > **Registry note** — sklearn PLSRegression on the (X augmented with sqrt(λ)·I, Y augmented with zeros) is the standard data-augmentation trick for L2-penalized PLS. pls4all now defaults to NIPALS on the augmented matrix to match the reference bit-for-bit; SIMPLS on the same augmented matrix introduces a different FP reduction order and diverges by ~1e-3 on small sizes. ### Parameters | Name | Type | Default | Notes | |------|------|---------|-------| | `n_components` | `int` | `2` | Number of latent components extracted (k). | | `ridge_lambda` | `float` | `1.0` | L2 (ridge) penalty added to the SIMPLS augmented system. | ## Explanations ### Bibliographic source Hoerl, A. E. & Kennard, R. W. (1970). *Ridge regression: biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems*. Technometrics 12(1), 55–67. — combined with PLS via Tikhonov regularisation of the inner regression. ### Mathematical principle When the number of components $k$ approaches the rank of $\mathbf{X}$, the inner regression of $\mathbf{Y}$ on the PLS scores becomes ill-conditioned. Ridge-augmented PLS adds an L2 penalty to that inner regression: $\hat{\mathbf{Q}} = (\mathbf{T}^{\top}\mathbf{T} + \lambda \mathbf{I})^{-1}\mathbf{T}^{\top}\mathbf{Y}$, yielding a shrinkage-stabilised coefficient matrix. Setting $\lambda$ from cross-validation on a logarithmic grid is the standard procedure. The combined method is more forgiving than pure PLS to a slightly over-specified $k$: pure PLS over-fits hard at $k > k_{\mathrm{opt}}$ while ridge-augmented degrades smoothly. Conceptually it is a continuous interpolation between PLS ($\lambda=0$) and a heavily-regularised low-rank ridge regression in latent space. When $\lambda$ is set per component via the SVD spectrum of $\mathbf{T}$, ridge PLS is closely related to Krylov-subspace PCR with shrinkage. ### Implementation `n4m_ridge_pls_fit` (in-sample only). No widely installable reference for this exact formulation; the test compares against an sklearn `PLSRegression` + manual Tikhonov inner regression. MATLAB header (`bindings/matlab/+pls4all/RidgePlsRegression.m`): ```text pls4all.RidgePlsRegression L2-augmented PLS regression. ``` ### Usage Direct `n4m` Python helper: ```python import n4m res = n4m.ridge_pls( X, y, n_components=4, ridge_lambda=0.5, ) y_hat = res["predictions"] coef = res["coefficients"] ``` The `n4m.sklearn.NativeRidgePLSRegressor` wrapper replays predictions from the returned coefficients plus reconstructed intercept. Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in `benchmarks.parity_timing.registry`. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN `pls` package (`plsr`, `pcr`, `mvr`) and for the `mdatools::pls(x, y, ...)` matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence. **pls4all bindings** ::::{tab-set} :class: pls4all-bindings :::{tab-item} C ABI · libn4m :sync: c :class-label: lang-c ```c /* C ABI — libn4m */ n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create(); n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create(); n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL; n4m_ridge_pls_fit(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res); /* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */ /* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */ n4m_method_result_destroy(res); n4m_config_destroy(cfg); n4m_context_destroy(ctx); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all (raw) :sync: python-raw :class-label: lang-python ```python import pls4all from pls4all._methods import ridge_pls_fit with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg: res = ridge_pls_fit(ctx, cfg, X, y, n_components=4) # then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"), # res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), … ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all.sklearn :sync: python-sklearn :class-label: lang-python ```python from pls4all.sklearn import RidgePLSRegression mdl = RidgePLSRegression(n_components=2, ridge_lambda=1.0) mdl.fit(X, y) y_hat = mdl.predict(X_test) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all_method() :sync: r-dispatcher :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) # Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup): res <- pls4all_method("ridge_pls", X, y, n_components = 4L, params = list(ridge_lambda = 0.5)) # res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars. # selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based. ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (MEX) :sync: matlab-mex :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab res = pls4all.ridge_pls(X, y, 4); % see header of bindings/matlab/+pls4all/ridge_pls.m for full % parameter surface: % res = ridge_pls(X, Y, n_components, ridge_lambda) yhat = predict(res, Xtest); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (classdef) :sync: matlab-classdef :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab mdl = pls4all.fit("ridge_pls", X, y, "NumComponents", 4); yhat = predict(mdl, Xtest); ``` ::: :::: **Registry parity references** 📐 :::{card} :class-card: external-refs - 📐 **`ref.python_scikit_learn`** (python · python) — `scikit-learn` 1.4.2 · qualitative (rmse_rel ≤ 1e-01) — Ridge-augmented PLS via sklearn PLSRegression on the (X aug, Y aug) matrices — standard data-augmentation trick to fold an L2 penalty into a least-squares-style algorithm. ::: ### Benchmarks Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against [`full_matrix.csv`](../benchmarks/overview.md). Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted. **Verdict**  ·  ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance  ·  ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline  ·  ✗ divergent  ·  ⚠ error  ·  — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆. **Reference gate**: qualitative — shape/smoke comparison only. The external library and pls4all do not produce numerically equivalent output for this method (see the MethodSpec notes); the `rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e-01` budget is set wide on purpose. Treat ~ shape as *“we ran both, both finished”*, not as numerical agreement. Rows tagged with **📐** are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in [`parity_timing.registry`](../benchmarks/methodology.md)). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band. ::::{tab-set} :class: parity-tabs :::{tab-item} 1 thread :sync: threads-1
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×50 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas≈ +9e-163.31 ms1.04 ms🏆11.3 ms🏆255.1 ms1.92 ms🏆2.73 ms5.39 ms53.3 ms434.2 ms🏆24.2 ms241.2 ms1.4 s🏆106.7 ms1.0 s🏆
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp≈ +9e-163.26 ms1.70 ms13.2 ms242.9 ms🏆2.19 ms2.60 ms5.52 ms50.1 ms🏆482.2 ms34.3 ms237.1 ms🏆1.5 s101.1 ms🏆1.1 s
pls4all.cpp.omp≈ +1e-153.68 ms1.11 ms13.9 ms289.2 ms1.96 ms2.79 ms4.68 ms🏆52.2 ms488.9 ms24.0 ms🏆261.4 ms1.5 s106.8 ms1.1 s
pls4all.cpp.ref≈ +1e-153.98 ms1.13 ms12.2 ms295.4 ms1.94 ms2.59 ms🏆6.09 ms52.3 ms487.2 ms25.5 ms250.3 ms1.6 s109.4 ms1.1 s
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind3.08 ms🏆2.17 ms2.64 ms
pls4all.sklearn≈ +4e-043.71 ms2.39 ms2.82 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R≈ +4e-0412.0 ms8.04 ms10.3 ms
pls4all.R.formula≈ +4e-0419.8 ms10.9 ms9.34 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools≈ +4e-0422.7 ms7.86 ms8.75 ms
pls4all.R.pls≈ +4e-0421.2 ms10.4 ms9.78 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +9e+004.65 ms3.62 ms4.27 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +9e+005.32 ms3.97 ms5.26 ms
Python · external
📐ref.python_scikit_learnsource4.26 ms2.97 ms3.03 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 3 threads :sync: threads-3
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×50 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas~ shape 6e-162.22 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp~ shape 6e-162.31 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp~ shape 1e-151.99 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref~ shape 1e-151.98 ms🏆
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind2.13 ms
pls4all.sklearn≈ +4e-043.27 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R≈ +4e-046.92 ms
pls4all.R.formula≈ +4e-049.11 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools≈ +4e-048.47 ms
pls4all.R.pls≈ +4e-048.63 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +9e+003.20 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +9e+004.25 ms
Python · external
📐ref.python_scikit_learnsource2.42 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 10 threads :sync: threads-10
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×50 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas~ shape 6e-161.79 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp~ shape 6e-161.79 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp~ shape 1e-151.77 ms🏆
pls4all.cpp.ref~ shape 1e-151.78 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ 1e-141.84 ms
pls4all.sklearn≈ +4e-041.89 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R≈ +4e-045.12 ms
pls4all.R.formula≈ +4e-045.97 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools≈ +4e-046.00 ms
pls4all.R.pls≈ +4e-046.04 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +9e+002.85 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +9e+003.24 ms
Python · external
📐ref.python_scikit_learnsource2.19 ms
::: :::: --- _See also_: [benchmark overview](../benchmarks/overview.md) · [methods index](index.md) · [interactive dashboard](../landing/dashboard.md)