# `stability_select` — MC-UVE (Monte-Carlo coefficient stability) _Group_: **Variable selector** · _Registry tolerance_: `1e-06` ## Description Stability/MCUVE selection (§18 Phase 5c) From the `pls4all.sklearn.StabilitySelector` docstring: > MCUVE-style stability selector via Monte-Carlo subsampling. > **Registry note** — R `plsVarSel::mcuve_pls` Monte-Carlo UVE stability ranking with top-k truncation. Default `_stability_select_pls4all` path mirrors the same R call with seed=11, giving bit-exact mask parity. The C++ splitmix64 kernel is opt-in via `legacy=True`. ### Parameters | Name | Type | Default | Notes | |------|------|---------|-------| | `top_k` | `int` | `None` | Number of features to retain. | | `n_components` | `int` | `2` | Number of latent components extracted (k). | | `n_iterations` | `int` | `50` | Number of selection iterations or Monte-Carlo passes. | | `seed` | `int` | `0` | Random seed for reproducible sampling/initialization. | | `n_folds` | `int` | `3` | Number of cross-validation folds used inside the selector. | ## Explanations ### Bibliographic source Cai, W., Li, Y. & Shao, X. (2008). *A variable selection method based on uninformative variable elimination for multivariate calibration of near-infrared spectra*. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 90(2), 188–194. ### Mathematical principle MC-UVE evaluates the **stability** of each feature's PLS coefficient across Monte-Carlo subsamples of the calibration set: $\mathrm{stab}_j = |\bar{b}_j| / s(b_j)$, where $\bar{b}_j$ and $s(b_j)$ are the mean and standard deviation of $b_j$ across $B$ bootstrap fits. Features with high stability ratio are reliably predictive; those with low ratio are noise-driven and discarded. Conceptually a univariate analogue of stability selection (Meinshausen & Bühlmann 2010). The interaction with collinearity in the spectrum is benign: collinear features tend to share the contribution across bootstraps in a stable way, so their joint stability is high. Typical Monte-Carlo budget: $B = 50$–$200$ subsamples, each at 80 % of the calibration size. ### Implementation `n4m_stability_select`. Reference: R `plsVarSel`. MATLAB header (`bindings/matlab/+pls4all/stability_select.m`): ```text pls4all.stability_select Coefficient-stability selector (MCUVE-style). ``` ### Usage Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in `benchmarks.parity_timing.registry`. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN `pls` package (`plsr`, `pcr`, `mvr`) and for the `mdatools::pls(x, y, ...)` matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence. **pls4all bindings** ::::{tab-set} :class: pls4all-bindings :::{tab-item} C ABI · libn4m :sync: c :class-label: lang-c ```c /* C ABI — libn4m */ n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create(); n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create(); n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL; n4m_stability_select_fit(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res); /* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */ /* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */ n4m_method_result_destroy(res); n4m_config_destroy(cfg); n4m_context_destroy(ctx); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all (raw) :sync: python-raw :class-label: lang-python ```python import pls4all from pls4all._methods import stability_select_fit with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg: res = stability_select_fit(ctx, cfg, X, y, n_components=4) # then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"), # res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), … ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all.sklearn :sync: python-sklearn :class-label: lang-python ```python from pls4all.sklearn import StabilitySelector mdl = StabilitySelector(top_k, n_components=2, n_iterations=50, seed=0, n_folds=3) mdl.fit(X, y) y_hat = mdl.predict(X_test) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all_method() :sync: r-dispatcher :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) # Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup): res <- pls4all_method("stability_select", X, y, n_components = 4L, params = list(top_k = 10L)) # res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars. # selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based. ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (MEX) :sync: matlab-mex :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab res = pls4all.stability_select(X, y, 4); % see header of bindings/matlab/+pls4all/stability_select.m for full % parameter surface: % res = stability_select(X, Y, n_components, top_k) yhat = predict(res, Xtest); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (classdef) :sync: matlab-classdef :class-label: lang-matlab _No idiomatic classdef wrapper — invoke `pls4all.fit("stability_select", X, y, …)` directly from the unified MEX factory._ ::: :::: **Registry parity references** 📐 :::{card} :class-card: external-refs - 📐 **`ref.r_plsvarsel`** (R · r) — `plsVarSel` 0.10.0 · strict (rmse_rel ≤ 1e-06) — R `plsVarSel::mcuve_pls` Monte-Carlo UVE. Returns the selected indices (no separate score buffer is exposed by the package; we just use the survivor list). ::: ### Benchmarks Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against [`full_matrix.csv`](../benchmarks/overview.md). Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted. **Verdict**  ·  ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance  ·  ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline  ·  ✗ divergent  ·  ⚠ error  ·  — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆. **Reference gate**: strict — numeric equivalence (`rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e-06`). Rows tagged with **📐** are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in [`parity_timing.registry`](../benchmarks/methodology.md)). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band. ::::{tab-set} :class: parity-tabs :::{tab-item} 1 thread :sync: threads-1
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas944.9 ms889.0 ms1.9 s🏆7.9 s715.6 ms854.8 ms2.7 s🏆34.8 s🏆173.4 s60.6 s877.2 s
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp582.5 ms880.5 ms2.0 s7.7 s🏆702.2 ms810.3 ms2.8 s35.4 s173.0 s61.4 s880.4 s
pls4all.cpp.omp912.5 ms871.3 ms🏆2.0 s7.9 s701.2 ms816.0 ms2.8 s35.2 s171.6 s🏆61.7 s881.1 s
pls4all.cpp.ref537.1 ms887.6 ms1.9 s8.3 s718.5 ms899.3 ms2.7 s35.1 s176.6 s60.5 s🏆873.2 s🏆
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind600.3 ms712.8 ms814.6 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+004.70 ms2.05 ms5.89 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+0013.4 ms5.43 ms13.2 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+0020.9 ms8.16 ms13.0 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+0018.9 ms6.48 ms9.19 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+0019.4 ms6.73 ms11.0 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+005.80 ms2.81 ms4.69 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+005.28 ms3.09 ms5.14 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource101.8 ms🏆243.0 ms🏆387.5 ms🏆
::: :::{tab-item} 3 threads :sync: threads-3
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas✓ ref639.1 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref640.1 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp✓ ref640.7 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref✓ ref642.9 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind652.9 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+002.01 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+005.24 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+006.07 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+007.08 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+007.01 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+002.67 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+003.07 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource215.1 ms🏆
::: :::{tab-item} 10 threads :sync: threads-10
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas✓ ref547.1 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref548.7 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp✓ ref554.1 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref✓ ref551.0 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind549.2 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+001.63 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+003.77 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+004.55 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+004.60 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+004.66 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+002.40 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+002.69 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource206.0 ms🏆
::: :::: --- _See also_: [benchmark overview](../benchmarks/overview.md) · [methods index](index.md) · [interactive dashboard](../landing/dashboard.md)