# `variable_select_coef` — Coefficient-magnitude selection _Group_: **Variable selector** · _Registry tolerance_: `1.1` ## Description |Coef| top-k selection (§18 Phase 5a, method=1) From the `pls4all.sklearn.CoefficientSelector` docstring: > |coef| top-k selector. Ranks features by the magnitude of their PLS regression coefficient on Y. > **Registry note** — R `pls::plsr(method='simpls')` |coef| ranking. The solver mismatch is fixed, but residual top-k drift remains because pls4all ranks its stored C-kernel coefficient vector while R reconstructs coefficients through `pls`'s SIMPLS convention. Mask RMSE-rel ~0=perfect, ~1=half disagree, ~1.41=disjoint; tolerance accepts this known coefficient-convention divergence. ### Parameters | Name | Type | Default | Notes | |------|------|---------|-------| | `top_k` | `int` | `None` | Number of features to retain. | | `n_components` | `int` | `2` | Number of latent components extracted (k). | | `solver` | `str` | `'simpls'` | Inner algorithm: 'nipals', 'simpls', 'svd', 'kernel', 'orthogonal-scores', 'power', 'randomized-svd', 'wide-kernel'. | | `center_x` | `bool` | `True` | Subtract the column mean of X before fitting. | | `scale_x` | `bool` | `True` | Standardize X columns to unit variance before fitting. | | `tol` | `float` | `1e-06` | Convergence tolerance for iterative solvers (NIPALS / power-iteration). | | `max_iter` | `int` | `500` | Maximum iterations for iterative solvers. | ## Explanations ### Bibliographic source Martens, H. & Næs, T. (1989). *Multivariate Calibration*, §5. — the simplest ranking baseline. ### Mathematical principle Rank features by the absolute magnitude of their PLS regression coefficient $|b_j|$ in the original feature scale. Pick the top-$k$ as the selected subset. This is the simplest possible PLS variable selector. It is biased — features with large variance get smaller coefficients for the same predictive effect — so it should usually be applied after autoscaling to remove the variance-induced bias. Once autoscaled, $|b_j|$ ranks features by their **standardised partial effect on $y$**, which is statistically meaningful. Useful as a sanity-check baseline against more sophisticated selectors. If a complex method does not beat coefficient-magnitude selection, it is probably over-engineered. ### Implementation `n4m_variable_select_rank` with metric=COEF. MATLAB header (`bindings/matlab/+pls4all/coefficient_select.m`): ```text pls4all.coefficient_select Coefficient-magnitude feature ranking. res = pls4all.coefficient_select(X, Y, n_components, top_k) Fits an internal SIMPLS model and ranks features by the magnitude of their regression coefficients. ``` ### Usage Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in `benchmarks.parity_timing.registry`. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN `pls` package (`plsr`, `pcr`, `mvr`) and for the `mdatools::pls(x, y, ...)` matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence. **pls4all bindings** ::::{tab-set} :class: pls4all-bindings :::{tab-item} C ABI · libn4m :sync: c :class-label: lang-c ```c /* C ABI — libn4m */ n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create(); n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create(); n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL; n4m_variable_select_rank(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res); /* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */ /* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */ n4m_method_result_destroy(res); n4m_config_destroy(cfg); n4m_context_destroy(ctx); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all (raw) :sync: python-raw :class-label: lang-python ```python import pls4all from pls4all._methods import variable_select_rank with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg: res = variable_select_rank(ctx, cfg, X, y, n_components=4) # then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"), # res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), … ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all.sklearn :sync: python-sklearn :class-label: lang-python ```python from pls4all.sklearn import CoefficientSelector mdl = CoefficientSelector(top_k, n_components=2, solver='simpls', center_x=True, scale_x=True, tol=1e-06, max_iter=500) mdl.fit(X, y) y_hat = mdl.predict(X_test) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all_method() :sync: r-dispatcher :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) # Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup): res <- pls4all_method("variable_select_coef", X, y, n_components = 4L, params = list(top_k = 10L)) # res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars. # selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based. ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (MEX) :sync: matlab-mex :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab res = pls4all.coefficient_select(X, y, 4); % see header of bindings/matlab/+pls4all/coefficient_select.m for full % parameter surface: % res = coefficient_select(X, Y, n_components, top_k) yhat = predict(res, Xtest); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (classdef) :sync: matlab-classdef :class-label: lang-matlab _No idiomatic classdef wrapper — invoke `pls4all.fit("variable_select_coef", X, y, …)` directly from the unified MEX factory._ ::: :::: **Registry parity references** 📐 :::{card} :class-card: external-refs - 📐 **`ref.r_pls`** (R · r) — `pls` 2.8.5 · qualitative (rmse_rel ≤ 1e+00) — R `pls::plsr` coefficient magnitudes — top-k indices ranked by |coef|. Mirrors method=1 of pls4all's ranker. ::: ### Benchmarks Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against [`full_matrix.csv`](../benchmarks/overview.md). Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted. **Verdict**  ·  ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance  ·  ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline  ·  ✗ divergent  ·  ⚠ error  ·  — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆. **Reference gate**: qualitative — shape/smoke comparison only. The external library and pls4all do not produce numerically equivalent output for this method (see the MethodSpec notes); the `rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e+00` budget is set wide on purpose. Treat ~ shape as *“we ran both, both finished”*, not as numerical agreement. Rows tagged with **📐** are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in [`parity_timing.registry`](../benchmarks/methodology.md)). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band. ::::{tab-set} :class: parity-tabs :::{tab-item} 1 thread :sync: threads-1
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas2.75 ms2.39 ms13.7 ms64.6 ms1.66 ms2.97 ms6.99 ms63.8 ms310.1 ms31.8 ms🏆323.5 ms1.6 s🏆121.7 ms🏆1.3 s🏆
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp2.77 ms1.95 ms🏆11.9 ms🏆62.2 ms🏆1.57 ms🏆2.63 ms🏆6.91 ms60.2 ms🏆321.5 ms32.1 ms326.3 ms1.6 s136.3 ms1.3 s
pls4all.cpp.omp2.53 ms🏆2.20 ms13.0 ms63.9 ms1.76 ms3.17 ms6.57 ms🏆64.7 ms302.3 ms🏆33.8 ms322.3 ms1.6 s132.3 ms1.3 s
pls4all.cpp.ref2.59 ms2.46 ms14.4 ms67.1 ms1.59 ms4.04 ms7.27 ms62.3 ms321.1 ms32.6 ms313.0 ms🏆1.6 s128.1 ms1.3 s
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind2.96 ms2.68 ms2.98 ms
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind4.48 ms2.16 ms3.38 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ bind22.5 ms5.77 ms15.3 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ bind28.4 ms6.59 ms16.3 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ bind26.0 ms5.93 ms10.7 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ bind26.8 ms8.13 ms15.6 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+005.84 ms3.12 ms4.48 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+005.70 ms3.37 ms6.07 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plssource20.8 ms17.6 ms23.3 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 3 threads :sync: threads-3
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas~ shape1.57 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp~ shape2.37 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp~ shape1.63 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref~ shape1.55 ms🏆
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind2.02 ms
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind1.94 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ bind5.22 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ bind6.53 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ bind6.41 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ bind6.27 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+003.15 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+004.90 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plssource12.9 ms
::: :::{tab-item} 10 threads :sync: threads-10
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas~ shape1.46 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp~ shape1.43 ms🏆
pls4all.cpp.omp~ shape1.45 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref~ shape1.44 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind2.30 ms
pls4all.sklearn✓ bind1.58 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✓ bind4.16 ms
pls4all.R.formula✓ bind5.04 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✓ bind4.64 ms
pls4all.R.pls✓ bind4.79 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+002.39 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+002.66 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plssource10.4 ms
::: :::: --- _See also_: [benchmark overview](../benchmarks/overview.md) · [methods index](index.md) · [interactive dashboard](../landing/dashboard.md)