# `variable_select_sr` — Selectivity Ratio _Group_: **Variable selector** · _Registry tolerance_: `1e-06` ## Description Selectivity-Ratio top-k (§18 Phase 5a, method=2) From the `pls4all.sklearn.SelectivityRatioSelector` docstring: > Selectivity Ratio top-k selector (Rajalahti 2009). > **Registry note** — R `plsVarSel::SR` on `pls::plsr(method='simpls', scale=FALSE)`. Default `_variable_select_rank_pls4all(rank_method=2)` path mirrors the same R call, giving bit-exact top-k mask parity. SR is deterministic (no RNG), so no seed pinning is required. The C++ `variable_select_rank` SR path (per-feature X-energy reconstruction) is opt-in via `legacy=True`. ### Parameters | Name | Type | Default | Notes | |------|------|---------|-------| | `top_k` | `int` | `None` | Number of features to retain. | | `n_components` | `int` | `2` | Number of latent components extracted (k). | | `solver` | `str` | `'simpls'` | Inner algorithm: 'nipals', 'simpls', 'svd', 'kernel', 'orthogonal-scores', 'power', 'randomized-svd', 'wide-kernel'. | | `center_x` | `bool` | `True` | Subtract the column mean of X before fitting. | | `scale_x` | `bool` | `True` | Standardize X columns to unit variance before fitting. | | `tol` | `float` | `1e-06` | Convergence tolerance for iterative solvers (NIPALS / power-iteration). | | `max_iter` | `int` | `500` | Maximum iterations for iterative solvers. | ## Explanations ### Bibliographic source Rajalahti, T., Arneberg, R., Berven, F. S., Myhr, K.-M., Ulvik, R. J. & Kvalheim, O. M. (2009). *Biomarker discovery in mass spectral profiles by means of selectivity ratio plot*. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 95(1), 35–48. ### Mathematical principle Selectivity Ratio (SR) measures the relative explained-to-residual variance of each feature along the **target-projected** PLS direction: $\mathrm{SR}_j = \mathrm{Var}(\hat{x}_j) / \mathrm{Var}(x_j - \hat{x}_j)$, where $\hat{x}_j$ is the projection of feature $j$ onto the target-projected loading vector $\mathbf{p}_{\mathrm{tp}}$ (a single direction in $\mathbf{X}$ space that captures all $\mathbf{Y}$-correlated variation). High SR means a feature's variance is dominated by its $y$-correlated part; low SR means the feature's variance is mostly orthogonal to $y$ (noise / interferent / matrix). SR therefore separates predictive features from structurally-correlated nuisance features. Unlike VIP, SR works with a single direction (the target projection), which means it scales gracefully to very many components and is interpretable as a univariate diagnostic per feature. ### Implementation `n4m_variable_select_rank` with metric=SR. MATLAB header (`bindings/matlab/+pls4all/selectivity_ratio_select.m`): ```text pls4all.selectivity_ratio_select Selectivity-ratio feature ranking. res = pls4all.selectivity_ratio_select(X, Y, n_components, top_k) Fits an internal SIMPLS model (store_scores=1) and ranks features by the Selectivity Ratio (SR) statistic. ``` ### Usage Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in `benchmarks.parity_timing.registry`. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN `pls` package (`plsr`, `pcr`, `mvr`) and for the `mdatools::pls(x, y, ...)` matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence. **pls4all bindings** ::::{tab-set} :class: pls4all-bindings :::{tab-item} C ABI · libn4m :sync: c :class-label: lang-c ```c /* C ABI — libn4m */ n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create(); n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create(); n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL; n4m_variable_select_rank(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res); /* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */ /* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */ n4m_method_result_destroy(res); n4m_config_destroy(cfg); n4m_context_destroy(ctx); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all (raw) :sync: python-raw :class-label: lang-python ```python import pls4all from pls4all._methods import variable_select_rank with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg: res = variable_select_rank(ctx, cfg, X, y, n_components=4) # then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"), # res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), … ``` ::: :::{tab-item} Python · pls4all.sklearn :sync: python-sklearn :class-label: lang-python ```python from pls4all.sklearn import SelectivityRatioSelector mdl = SelectivityRatioSelector(top_k, n_components=2, solver='simpls', center_x=True, scale_x=True, tol=1e-06, max_iter=500) mdl.fit(X, y) y_hat = mdl.predict(X_test) ``` ::: :::{tab-item} R · pls4all_method() :sync: r-dispatcher :class-label: lang-r ```r library(pls4all) # Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup): res <- pls4all_method("variable_select_sr", X, y, n_components = 4L, params = list(top_k = 10L)) # res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars. # selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based. ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (MEX) :sync: matlab-mex :class-label: lang-matlab ```matlab res = pls4all.selectivity_ratio_select(X, y, 4); % see header of bindings/matlab/+pls4all/selectivity_ratio_select.m for full % parameter surface: % res = selectivity_ratio_select(X, Y, n_components, top_k) yhat = predict(res, Xtest); ``` ::: :::{tab-item} MATLAB · pls4all (classdef) :sync: matlab-classdef :class-label: lang-matlab _No idiomatic classdef wrapper — invoke `pls4all.fit("variable_select_sr", X, y, …)` directly from the unified MEX factory._ ::: :::: **Registry parity references** 📐 :::{card} :class-card: external-refs - 📐 **`ref.r_plsvarsel`** (R · r) — `plsVarSel` 0.10.0 · strict (rmse_rel ≤ 1e-06) — R `plsVarSel::SR` selectivity ratio on a fitted `pls::plsr` model. Top-k indices. ::: ### Benchmarks Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against [`full_matrix.csv`](../benchmarks/overview.md). Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted. **Verdict**  ·  ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance  ·  ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline  ·  ✗ divergent  ·  ⚠ error  ·  — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆. **Reference gate**: strict — numeric equivalence (`rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e-06`). Rows tagged with **📐** are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in [`parity_timing.registry`](../benchmarks/methodology.md)). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band. ::::{tab-set} :class: parity-tabs :::{tab-item} 1 thread :sync: threads-1
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas413.7 ms616.2 ms🏆899.9 ms1.9 s431.6 ms452.0 ms654.9 ms1.4 s5.3 s903.8 ms4.2 s🏆28.7 s🏆1.7 s25.7 s
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp408.7 ms623.5 ms881.8 ms🏆1.9 s🏆435.6 ms445.4 ms643.0 ms1.4 s5.3 s900.4 ms🏆4.3 s28.9 s1.7 s25.7 s🏆
pls4all.cpp.omp417.0 ms632.8 ms887.1 ms1.9 s418.4 ms453.3 ms636.6 ms🏆1.4 s5.2 s🏆918.3 ms4.3 s28.9 s1.7 s25.8 s
pls4all.cpp.ref419.0 ms633.5 ms895.8 ms1.9 s424.4 ms460.0 ms653.7 ms1.4 s🏆5.5 s908.3 ms4.3 s28.8 s1.7 s🏆25.8 s
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind400.5 ms426.6 ms445.4 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+002.70 ms2.18 ms3.10 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+0012.7 ms6.23 ms13.8 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+0023.2 ms6.78 ms14.3 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+0020.3 ms7.10 ms11.9 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+0023.1 ms8.66 ms11.3 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+006.75 ms2.62 ms4.67 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+004.69 ms3.22 ms6.86 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource17.7 ms🏆16.7 ms🏆16.8 ms🏆
::: :::{tab-item} 3 threads :sync: threads-3
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas✓ ref400.5 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref407.3 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp✓ ref406.3 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref✓ ref402.6 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind402.0 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+001.96 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+006.35 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+006.51 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+006.39 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+007.58 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+004.13 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+003.19 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource11.5 ms🏆
::: :::{tab-item} 10 threads :sync: threads-10
BackendParity50×250 (ms)100×50 (ms)100×500 (ms)100×2500 (ms)200×40 (ms)250×50 (ms)500×50 (ms)500×500 (ms)500×2500 (ms)2500×50 (ms)2500×500 (ms)2500×2500 (ms)10000×50 (ms)10000×500 (ms)
C++ native · libn4m
pls4all.cpp.blas✓ ref371.5 ms
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp✓ ref370.9 ms
pls4all.cpp.omp✓ ref368.1 ms
pls4all.cpp.ref✓ ref368.1 ms
Python · pls4all
pls4all.python✓ bind371.9 ms
pls4all.sklearn✗ +1e+001.95 ms
R · pls4all
pls4all.R✗ +1e+004.54 ms
pls4all.R.formula✗ +1e+004.72 ms
pls4all.R.mdatools✗ +1e+004.74 ms
pls4all.R.pls✗ +1e+004.82 ms
MATLAB · pls4all
pls4all.matlab✗ +1e+002.36 ms
pls4all.matlab.classdef✗ +1e+002.70 ms
R · external
📐ref.r_plsvarselsource10.4 ms🏆
::: :::: --- _See also_: [benchmark overview](../benchmarks/overview.md) · [methods index](index.md) · [interactive dashboard](../landing/dashboard.md)