st_select — ST-PLS — Score Threshold selection¶
Group: Variable selector · Registry tolerance: 1e-06
Description¶
ST-PLS soft-thresholded sparse PLS (§18 Phase 5u)
From the pls4all.sklearn.STSelector docstring:
ST-PLS — soft-thresholded sparse PLS selector.
Registry note — R
plsVarSel::stpls(Sæbø et al. 2008 ST-PLS, J. Chemom. 20, 54-62) with the shrink-ladder sweep (0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) picking the most-shrunk model that still has >= min_selected non-zero coefs. Default_st_select_pls4allpath mirrors the same R call with seed=11, giving bit-exact mask parity. The C++ absolute-threshold kernel is opt-in vialegacy=True.
Parameters¶
Name |
Type |
Default |
Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Sequence of soft-threshold values to sweep; the most aggressive surviving subset is kept. |
|
|
|
Number of latent components extracted (k). |
|
`int |
None` |
|
Explanations¶
Bibliographic source¶
Mehmood, T., Liland, K. H., Snipen, L. & Sæbø, S. (2012). A review of variable selection methods in partial least squares regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 118, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2012.07.010 — same review as shaving_select; §3.4 Score-threshold methods covers the deterministic-threshold family implemented here.
Mathematical principle¶
Apply deterministic thresholds on the standardised coefficient (or VIP) scores: keep features whose absolute score exceeds the threshold \(\tau\), with a minimum-retained fallback to avoid the empty selection. The benchmark scans a grid of thresholds and returns the subset with lowest CV-RMSE.
Conceptually similar to UVE but uses absolute thresholds rather than noise-baseline-relative ones. Less elegant but cheaper since no augmented noise matrix is needed.
Implementation¶
n4m_st_select.
MATLAB header (bindings/matlab/+pls4all/st_select.m):
pls4all.st_select Score-threshold selector (sweep over thresholds).
Usage¶
Every pls4all binding tab dispatches into the same C kernel; the external libraries listed at the bottom of the page are the parity references registered in benchmarks.parity_timing.registry. Switch tabs to read the same fit in your language. The R package now ships drop-in-compatible facades for the CRAN pls package (plsr, pcr, mvr) and for the mdatools::pls(x, y, ...) matrix idiom — those tabs appear only on the methods that have a meaningful equivalence.
pls4all bindings
/* C ABI — libn4m */
n4m_context_t* ctx = n4m_context_create();
n4m_config_t* cfg = n4m_config_create();
n4m_method_result_t* res = NULL;
n4m_st_select_fit(ctx, cfg, &x_view, &y_view, /* hyperparams */, &res);
/* … read coefficients / mask / scores via */
/* n4m_method_result_get_double_matrix / vector / scalar … */
n4m_method_result_destroy(res);
n4m_config_destroy(cfg);
n4m_context_destroy(ctx);
import pls4all
from pls4all._methods import st_select_fit
with pls4all.Context() as ctx, pls4all.Config() as cfg:
res = st_select_fit(ctx, cfg, X, y)
# then: res.matrix("predictions"), res.matrix("coefficients"),
# res.vector("mask"), res.scalar("intercept"), …
from pls4all.sklearn import STSelector
mdl = STSelector(thresholds, n_components=2, min_selected=None)
mdl.fit(X, y)
y_hat = mdl.predict(X_test)
library(pls4all)
# Unified low-level dispatcher (May 2026 R cleanup):
res <- pls4all_method("st_select", X, y,
n_components = 2L)
# res is a named list with MethodResult arrays/scalars.
# selected_indices / top_k_intervals are 1-based.
res = pls4all.st_select(X, y, 2);
% see header of bindings/matlab/+pls4all/st_select.m for full
% parameter surface:
% res = st_select(X, Y, n_components, thresholds, min_selected)
yhat = predict(res, Xtest);
No idiomatic classdef wrapper — invoke pls4all.fit("st_select", X, y, …) directly from the unified MEX factory.
Registry parity references 📐
📐
ref.r_plsvarsel(R · r) —plsVarSel0.10.0 · strict (rmse_rel ≤ 1e-06) — RplsVarSel::stpls(Sæbø et al. 2008) — soft-threshold PLS variable selection. We sweep the shrink parameter and pick the most aggressive shrinkage that still keeps ≥min_selectedfeatures non-zero (mirrors pls4all’s min-selected guard).
Benchmarks¶
Adaptive wall-clock per cell measured against full_matrix.csv. Only backends that implement this method are listed; libraries without the method are omitted.
Verdict · ✓ ref / ≈ ref / ~ shape mark a reference-gate pass at strict / relaxed / qualitative tolerance · ✓ bind = pls4all binding agrees with the C++ baseline · ⇄ cross-check = documented by-design selector/RNG/model, noncanonical API/facade convention, or secondary oracle · ✗ divergent · ⚠ error · — not run. The fastest backend per column is marked 🏆.
Reference gate: strict — numeric equivalence (rmse_rel_tol ≤ 1e-06).
Rows tagged with 📐 are the canonical parity references for this method (declared in parity_timing.registry). C++ and external rows show reference parity; pls4all language bindings show binding parity against the C++ backend. Hover the icon for role and tolerance band.
| Backend | Parity | 200×40 (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| C++ native · libn4m | ||
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp | ✓ J 1.00 | 403.7 ms |
| Python · pls4all | ||
pls4all.python | ✓ J 1.00 | 418.3 ms |
pls4all.sklearn | ⇄ J 0.57 | 1.82 ms🏆 |
| R · pls4all | ||
pls4all.R | ⇄ J 0.57 | 6.05 ms |
pls4all.R.formula | ⇄ J 0.57 | 5.27 ms |
pls4all.R.mdatools | ⇄ J 0.57 | 5.45 ms |
pls4all.R.pls | ⇄ J 0.57 | 5.46 ms |
| R · external | ||
📐ref.r_plsvarsel | source | 17.8 ms |
| Backend | Parity | 200×40 (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| C++ native · libn4m | ||
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp | ✓ J 1.00 | 399.6 ms |
| Python · pls4all | ||
pls4all.python | ✓ J 1.00 | 400.5 ms |
pls4all.sklearn | ⇄ J 0.57 | 1.95 ms🏆 |
| R · pls4all | ||
pls4all.R | ⇄ J 0.57 | 4.89 ms |
pls4all.R.formula | ⇄ J 0.57 | 6.39 ms |
pls4all.R.mdatools | ⇄ J 0.57 | 8.78 ms |
pls4all.R.pls | ⇄ J 0.57 | 5.32 ms |
| R · external | ||
📐ref.r_plsvarsel | source | 17.5 ms |
| Backend | Parity | 200×40 (ms) |
|---|---|---|
| C++ native · libn4m | ||
pls4all.cpp.blas+omp | ✓ J 1.00 | 429.2 ms |
| Python · pls4all | ||
pls4all.python | ✓ J 1.00 | 435.3 ms |
pls4all.sklearn | ⇄ J 0.57 | 1.78 ms🏆 |
| R · pls4all | ||
pls4all.R | ⇄ J 0.57 | 4.31 ms |
pls4all.R.formula | ⇄ J 0.57 | 6.27 ms |
pls4all.R.mdatools | ⇄ J 0.57 | 6.77 ms |
pls4all.R.pls | ⇄ J 0.57 | 5.49 ms |
| R · external | ||
📐ref.r_plsvarsel | source | 19.4 ms |
See also: benchmark overview · methods index · interactive dashboard